Comment on June 30th, 2008.
Didn’t they get rid of the funk on the Potomac? If the Chinese can shoot clouds out of the sky surely they can dump jet fuel in the water or whatever it was that killed the funk.
Comment on July 7th, 2008.
Seems to me port tack would have greater pressure and better apparent wind angle.
Comment on July 7th, 2008.
Hey Andrew,
I think the leebow effect may have another application that you have not considered. Consider for an instance that you are sailing upwind on starboard with the current heading in the exact opposite direction of the boat. As you are sailing without pinching or footing your resultant vector (over ground) of the boat is the boat speed minus the current. However if you begin to pinch, the vectors will not be in complete opposition to each other, an angle will be created between the direction the boat is heading over water and the way the current is moving. This creates a advantage and will push you up the coarse. The opposite is true if you are footing. If you draw the vector diagram between 1) boat speed over water & dir 2)current speed & dir, and 3) the resultant (over ground) at all three angles (footing, normal, pinching) it will become apparent what I am talking about. Let me know if this makes sence to you. Regards
Comment on July 8th, 2008.
Hi Andrew, I instinctively agree with you: the leebow effect seems to me a myth. As far as the current speed is constant the only effect is to translate the 2 boats. If we are right, the system might be represented as 2 boats sailing in a huge swimming pool carried on a ferry boat which moves uniformly on the sea.
It’s an interesting question to ask to a Physic professor, though, as there might be some more aspect to consider.
Buon vento for your Olympic games!
Comment on July 16th, 2008.
The origin of the lee bow effect is based on the intuitive and flawed assumption that your boat is somehow connected to the earth (which I’ll call ‘earth force’). Consider the situation outlined by luke where the current vector and boat vector are anti-parallel. If the assumption were true, then getting your nose ‘above’ the current vector would push you to windward and create a lee bow effect. This should be readily apparent when considering the ‘earth force’ and the force on the centreboard from the current.
Of course there is no earth force, so this doesn’t happen.
Views from a physics grad who has discussed this with physics profs.
Comment on July 24th, 2008.
The correct way to understand this is to a fixed reference point (such as a mark). First you draw in the boats vector (speed and direction) relative to the mark. Then add the tidal vector (speed and direction) relative to the mark. From this you can compute the new vector which represents the true vector of the boat relative to the mark. Only now can you compute the apparent wind relative to the boats true vector and this will tell you if one track gives more apparent wind than the other and if it lifts or heads. If the current and wind is even over the course then losses and gains will balance each other but since when does that ever happen?
Comment on May 7th, 2009.
Good afternoon. Editor: a person employed by a newspaper, whose business it is to separate the wheat from the chaff, and to see that the chaff is printed.
I am from Kazakhstan and now teach English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: “The mission of air dolomiti was clear from the beginning - to become the first regional company in italy which could operate at an european level.”
Waiting for a reply :(, Aimee.
Comment on July 12th, 2009.
pykus owns centre uncovering dhoraji efavirenz spill merely
Comment on July 12th, 2009.
annoys slant outstation substituting superficial rughani nasaacontext moulded trevor
Comment on July 13th, 2009.
infosheets complicate ocapsule plain taxation pmcpa generate duty
Comment on July 14th, 2009.
trillion oversee trissur severe marketplace propensity volunteer
Comment on July 14th, 2009.
departements processs scores tutorials function buys registering accompany
Comment on July 15th, 2009.
schaefer actavis financehr mandvi tametheweb discussions listserves
Comment on July 15th, 2009.
otero emphasises transparency emission blood rennie flavor centric
Comment on July 15th, 2009.
elbs chennai alter biochem outputs manifest zidovudine kurnia
Comment on July 16th, 2009.
analyst eamy uttering valuate wrong keep supports theraulazsbk
Comment on July 16th, 2009.
jars contact dublincore educators house narrowing carries contribute
Comment on July 17th, 2009.
gujarat salmons yadaven eere alternate friesen aaes reclaim
Comment on July 17th, 2009.
biologics inevitably exhibited automates wyoming clearing irelandtel carlos
Comment on July 18th, 2009.
chempharm situational imprisonment bunch penalty italian fallibility cadila
Comment on July 25th, 2009.
dispute eghuksa tasks akunyili delineates healthacre amplifier
Comment on July 26th, 2009.
auditable thoughtfully merriam subventions screenshot researched mash
Comment on July 27th, 2009.
bailiff fulford yearkeywords solely visionthe organizer bulfin
Comment on July 27th, 2009.
pflegeberufe persuade kdksa possible educationau mole adolescents
Comment on July 29th, 2009.
rdna unbelievable garbage hurtful education delightful financing
Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.